[repo-coord] Packaging Dilemma
Jeff Pitman
symbiont at berlios.de
Mon May 17 17:31:29 CEST 2004
Hi:
I'm not 100% decided on the PyVault nomenclature, but in the meantime
I've run into something that's made me frown :( because it runs against
my goals for the PyVault repo.
/usr/share/pygtk/2.0/* is my bane. But, others come into play as well,
such as /usr/include/pygtk-2.0/, /usr/lib/pkgconfig/*. These files are
usually from a set of -devel packages. The ones specifically that I am
building are gnome-python, pygtk2. I wanted to make sure that
installed files were totally separate so that these packages could
co-exist with other Python library packages that were attached to
another version of Python, say 2.2.2. I want to avoid Provides:
because I'm afraid that the redhat-config-* family will get goofed up.
These config programs require pygtk2. Currently, I'm naming it
python2.3-pygtk2 ... .rpm.
Thoughts?
--
-jeff
More information about the repo-coord
mailing list