[MythDora] MythDora, RHEL5/CentOS, and atrpms

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 12:13:29PM -0400, gchris wrote:
> Dennis Hand wrote:
> >>> So sounds like supporting two versions would be necessary in order to
> >>> keep the public happy.
> >> You mean a Fedora and a RHEL one? Yes, the RHEL mythdora should not
> >> eat up the Fedora based one. At least not yet ;)
> > OK, well Jarod had better get me caught up on how to spin with Pungi
> > if we're going to support two versions, x64, LiveCD. Pheeew my brain
> > is hurting.
> > 
> Think about the permutations!
> Hypothetical:
> I'm building a new system. Should I use MD/F or MD/R?
> What MB are you using?  Abit xx/yy.
> That uses the new I975 chipset so you should use MD/F.
> And I want to use firewire...?
> Oh. that's currently broken in MD/F but it works in MD/R.
> So which should I use?
> Neither. :-(

But at least the guy w/ Abit xx/yy and w/o I975 is happy, as well as
the guy w/o Abit xx/yy, but w/ I975.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/mythdora/attachments/20070808/6686a17c/attachment-0001.bin