[MythDora] Autoloading modules in 2.6.20

[Jarod Wilson]

On Friday 13 April 2007 01:55:57 gchris wrote:
> Jarod Wilson wrote:
> > On Wednesday 11 April 2007 00:40:26 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 21:20:26 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 16:06:40 Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday 10 April 2007 15:26:59 Axel Thimm wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 12:53:30PM -0400, gchris wrote:
> >>>>>> Just idle speculation on my part, but is mythtv-setup truly a
> >>>>>> standalone application or does it link to subroutines over in
> >>>>>> mythbackend?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It doesn't link to mythbackend, but both share common code in
> >>>>> libmyth* libs.
> >>>>
> >>>> And I am replacing all bits with bits built from the same revision at
> >>>> all times. Latest update:
> >>>>
> >>>> r13188 and 13045 of svn trunk work, r12854 does not. Building r12954
> >>>> right now for testing...
> >>>
> >>> Okay, r12954 is bunk. Now for 12973...
> >>
> >> Aaaaarrrrrrrrrggggggghhhh.... Just throw all that out the window. I have
> >> no idea why 12854 didn't work earlier, but its working now. Had to move
> >> to a different test box due to hardware stability issues (box
> >> hard-locked 3x in one day), but same card, same arch and same kernel,
> >> and now even svn trunk r12782 works for me (but 0.20-fixes continues to
> >> not work). Not sure if it was just a hardware problem or what... Ugh.
> >> Now I need to build some even older builds...
> >
> > Bam. I've got 0.20 working now, and I just committed the fixes to the
> > release-0-20-fixes mythtv svn branch.
> >
> > Axel, a new mythtv build is most definitely in order. I'm working with
> > Janne G. on sorting through other open 0.20 mythtv trac tickets to see if
> > there's additional stuff we need to fix, but the changes that are in now
> > should resolve multiple tickets (in addition to making digital scanning
> > w/one of the biggest cable companies in the US actually work).
>
> Congratulations big guy! Way to go!!!

Unfortunately, its NOT fixed. I'm a moron. I had both a source-based svn build 
and an rpm build of 0.20. It was the svn build that was scanning properly. 
0.20 still falls on its face. :(

However, I think I've almost got an actual working 0.20 build together... Ugh.

-- 
Jarod Wilson
jarod at wilsonet.com