[MythDora] Transcode failed with status: 0

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Feb 28 22:40:23 CET 2007


On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:56:34AM -0500, Dennis Hand wrote:
> > Can you check with rpm -qRp on this package? There is no such package
> > at ATrpms, there was only lame-3.96.1-11 from 2004 (note the dash and
> > dot position).
> 
> 
> # rpm -qRp lame-3.96.1-11.fc5.at.i386.rpm
> 
> /sbin/ldconfig
> /sbin/ldconfig
> libc.so.6
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
> libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
> libm.so.6
> libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
> libncurses.so.5
> ncurses >= 5.0
> rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
> rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
> 
> > Maybe it's not missing/needed at all?
> Oh it does look to be needed as users are saying things are working
> fine now. Just for the hell of it I ran another dependency check on my
> version-3.2 tree and it comes back with no errors. It simply looks as
> if this version may have just had a problem.

Yes, the lib should had been listed in the above. It looks quite
broken. Maybe it was, it's more than 2 years ago, and I remember some
lame stuff on bugzilla and lists.

Is it easy to update the package in the iso? Or are you going straight
for FC6/F7?

> Dennis
> 
> 
> On 2/28/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 09:37:04AM -0500, Dennis Hand wrote:
> > > Hmmm, thats very odd. I can do a dependency check on my FC5 tree and
> > > libmp3lame won't come up as a missing dependency. This is an older
> > > version of lame-3.96-1.11 so not sure if that has anything to do with
> > > it.
> >
> > Can you check with rpm -qRp on this package? There is no such package
> > at ATrpms, there was only lame-3.96.1-11 from 2004 (note the dash and
> > dot position).
> >
> > In fact it's very difficult to not have these dependencies created,
> > because rpm does that automatically.
> >
> > > It's not a big deal really. I just found it odd that alot of my
> > > members started posting about all these ripping and transcoding
> > > problems and finally someone posted saying that this one rpm was
> > > missing. I do have this in the new FC6 build so I'm all good now.
> >
> > Maybe it's not missing/needed at all?
> >
> > > Dennis
> > >
> > > On 2/28/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:39:17PM -0500, Dennis Hand wrote:
> > > > > >How can that happen (technically)? Isn't this checked by anaconda at
> > > > > >creation time? Or is the dependency on the package missing? If it's
> > > > > >the latter I'd like to fix that in the package.
> > > > >
> > > > > The libmp3lame is not a dependency of lame and it really should be. I
> > > > > guess I should have emailed you on this but I actually just found this
> > > > > out a short while ago. I do a total dependency check on my install tree
> > > > > just before I build a new ISO and libmp3lame never came back as a
> > > > > missing dependency and this is why I didn't catch it. This is on the FC5
> > > > > build but FC6 lame does require libmp3lame.
> > > >
> > > > The lame package has the following dependency:
> > > >
> > > > $ rpm -qR lame | grep mp3
> > > > libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit)
> > > >
> > > > (That's on x86_64, so you get the extra '()(64bit)', but the same holds
> > > >  true for i386)
> > > >
> > > > This is provided by
> > > >
> > > > $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit)'
> > > > libmp3lame0-3.97-15.fc6.at
> > > >
> > > > If I check the same on FC5/i386, and even use repoquery I find the same:
> > > >
> > > > # repoquery -q --whatprovides 'libmp3lame.so.0'
> > > > libmp3lame0-0:3.97-15.fc5.at.i386
> > > > # rpm -e libmp3lame0
> > > > error: Failed dependencies:
> > > >         libmp3lame.so.0 is needed by (installed) lame-3.97-15.fc5.at.i386
> > > >         libmp3lame.so.0 is needed by (installed) libquicktime-0.9.10-18.fc5.at.i386
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > mythdora mailing list
> > > > mythdora at atrpms.net
> > > > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/mythdora
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mythdora mailing list
> > > mythdora at atrpms.net
> > > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/mythdora
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mythdora mailing list
> > mythdora at atrpms.net
> > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/mythdora
> >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mythdora mailing list
> mythdora at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/mythdora

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/mythdora/attachments/20070228/a602c050/attachment.bin 


More information about the mythdora mailing list