[MythDora] Transcode failed with status: 0
d00dtv at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 15:37:04 CET 2007
Hmmm, thats very odd. I can do a dependency check on my FC5 tree and
libmp3lame won't come up as a missing dependency. This is an older
version of lame-3.96-1.11 so not sure if that has anything to do with
it. It's not a big deal really. I just found it odd that alot of my
members started posting about all these ripping and transcoding
problems and finally someone posted saying that this one rpm was
missing. I do have this in the new FC6 build so I'm all good now.
On 2/28/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:39:17PM -0500, Dennis Hand wrote:
> > >How can that happen (technically)? Isn't this checked by anaconda at
> > >creation time? Or is the dependency on the package missing? If it's
> > >the latter I'd like to fix that in the package.
> > The libmp3lame is not a dependency of lame and it really should be. I
> > guess I should have emailed you on this but I actually just found this
> > out a short while ago. I do a total dependency check on my install tree
> > just before I build a new ISO and libmp3lame never came back as a
> > missing dependency and this is why I didn't catch it. This is on the FC5
> > build but FC6 lame does require libmp3lame.
> The lame package has the following dependency:
> $ rpm -qR lame | grep mp3
> (That's on x86_64, so you get the extra '()(64bit)', but the same holds
> true for i386)
> This is provided by
> $ rpm -q --whatprovides 'libmp3lame.so.0()(64bit)'
> If I check the same on FC5/i386, and even use repoquery I find the same:
> # repoquery -q --whatprovides 'libmp3lame.so.0'
> # rpm -e libmp3lame0
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libmp3lame.so.0 is needed by (installed) lame-3.97-15.fc5.at.i386
> libmp3lame.so.0 is needed by (installed) libquicktime-0.9.10-18.fc5.at.i386
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> mythdora mailing list
> mythdora at atrpms.net
More information about the mythdora