[ATrpms-users] ARM Architecture Packages

[Gordan Bobic]

On 02/05/2012 13:48, Brian Long wrote:
> Hi Gordan,
>
> I'm not sure how long you've been using ATrpms,

Years.

> but I believe someone
> would need to step up and handle the builds and any issues that crop up.

Indeed, but most packages tend to build and work OK. So as a first pass, 
having everything that builds as is from src.rpms would be nice. I'd be 
more than happy to look into any build failures. I can take all of 
atrpms src.rpm packages and rebuild them myself, but I don't want to 
diminish the value of other repositories by effectively usurping the 
work of the maintainers thus far.

If there is no interest in supporthing ARM, then fine, I'll fork and 
maintain the ARM repository myself (same way I keep up with upstream - 
this wouldn't be any different).

>   We cannot just pile more work on Axel as I believe he's already
> overloaded.  :-)

I get that, see above.

> A few of us have discussed helping Axel set up a new build system to
> automate more of the tasks (like koji for Fedora).  It really hasn't
> taken off just yet.

I'm in the process of putting together a koji for RedSleeve, but in 
fairness I am not too sure what the advantage is relative to the 
increase in complexity, compared to simply having a NFS path with all 
the src.rpms and a 10 line shell script that puts down lock files and 
fires up mock to build each package in turn (and copies the built 
packages to a repository path, and saves the logs for any build 
failures). Sure, koji is a bit more "enterprisey", but I just don't see 
any fundamental benefit.

> Would you be willing to dedicate time to help build the ARM version of
> packages?

Absolutely, see above. The reason I ask is because I just had to build 
mediawiki for el6-arm (from the atrpms src.rpm). This sort of thing 
crops up all the time so I figured I can't be the only one that would 
find this sort of thing useful. And of course it's nice not having to do 
_everything_ myself. ;)

Gordan