[ATrpms-users] curl binary?

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 21:18 -0500, Chris Schanzle wrote:
> On 01/14/2011 12:00 PM, Noel Leistad - atrpms wrote:
> > Platform EL5 (CentOS)
> >
> > w/ atrpms-testing repo enabled,
> >
> > attempts to install curl reports curl obsoleted by libcurl3, however,
> > libcurl3, at least as reported on my system only installs 2 .so files,
> > not the binary???
> >
> > Source of binary that doesn't conflict w/ the libcurl3 package?

The binary is also in atrpms-testing. BTW this is the official vendor
upgrade scheme within RHEL (5->6).

I wonder why yum upgrade didn't catch the binary as well. Maybe a bug in
yum? Or do you have any selective/partial filtering turned on?

> Confirming the same observation here too.  Requiring the main curl 
> package (same version) seems to help:

The split was made so that one can install libcurl w/o the binary, so
adding this dependency effectively molds the subpackages back to one
again.
-- 
http://thimm.gr/ - http://ATrpms.net/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20110117/d70b283a/attachment.sig>