[ATrpms-users] vlc, xulrunner updates for f12
Paulo Cavalcanti
promac at gmail.com
Sat Jul 3 14:08:46 CEST 2010
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:15 PM, John Pilkington <J.Pilk at tesco.net> wrote:
> On 02/07/10 14:49, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brian Long <briandlong at gmail.com
>> <mailto:briandlong at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:00 AM, John Pilkington <J.Pilk at tesco.net
>> <mailto:J.Pilk at tesco.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Output from vlc-1.1.0-55.fc12 at x86_64:
>> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.DMn2nv: line 2: vlc-cache-gen: command not found
>> warning: %post(vlc-1.1.0-55.fc12.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit
>> status 127
>>
>> And xulrunner didn't upgrade because I don't yet have firefox 3.6
>>
>>
>> I don't see vlc 1.1.0 available on f13 x86_64 in any of the AtRPMS
>> repos. Was it built for f13?
>>
>>
>> It is on the way.
>>
>> We are having trouble with vlc 1.1.0 on RHEL5, but I think
>> everything has ben fixed.
>>
>> I am wathing Brasil x Holand right now with vlc 1.1.0 (v4l2) on RHEL5!!
>>
>>
> I ought to say that vlc f12 seems to be working well for me in spite of the
> installation error report. I hope yuor viewing is enjoyable...
>
> But yesterday I did an upgrade on my el5 P4 box and I now see no v4l
> entries in dmesg. I haven't used it for OTA stuff recently so I'm not sure
> if this is new. A dvb usb stick works, but no sign of saa7134 or my PCI dvb
> card. dmesg does say 'video_buf exports duplicate symbol
> videobuf_mmap_mapper (owned by videobuf_core)' and says it four times.
> I tried renaming video-buf.ko to .obsolete, which used to be thought
> helpful. That silenced the complaint but didn't make things work. I'll try
> to investigate more later but at present it's a puzzle rather than a
> disaster.
>
>
>
Well, there are new kernels, which bring new problems.
Do you have video4linux installed?
What is the version of your module-init-tools?
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20100703/80760129/attachment.html>
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list