[ATrpms-users] x264 incompatible with gstreamer-plugins-bad from Freshrpms

[Andre Costa]

Hi Axel,

On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 18:21, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 04:10:34PM -0300, Andre Costa wrote:
> > I've been using Freshrpms for quite some time already and recently
> enabled
> > ATrpms in order to grab a newer version for mplayerplug-in[*], but now I
> > have this conflict. "smart upgrade" yields this:
> >
> > Upgrading packages (1):
> >   x264-0.60-6_20080626.2245.fc9 at x86_64
> >
> > Installing packages (1):
> >   libx264gtk60-0.60-6_20080626.2245.fc9 at x86_64
> >
> >
> > Removing packages (1):
> >   gstreamer-plugins-bad-0.10.7-2.fc9 at x86_64
> >
> >
> > Installed x264 is
> >
> > x264-0.0.0-0.6.20080510.fc9.x86_64
> >
> > from Freshrpms.
> >
> > Any chance ATrpms and Freshrpms could work together to fix this?
>
> Certainly. ATrpms is already splitting the package up in a base part
> and a pure runtime part, that can coexist with others. I.e. you can
> have libx264.so.{54,58,60} installed in parallel if different
> applications have been built against different versions of x264.


Any news on that front? So far I am still avoiding x264 from ATrpms, but
that's not how it should be done, I guess -- besides being sort of a PITA
;-) I sent an email to Matthias as well at that time about this, but it
seemed to me little would be done on Freshrpms side [
http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2008-August/015128.html],
so I am turning my hopes to ATrpms =)

Regards,

Andre
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20080910/bca22c5a/attachment.html