[ATrpms-users] atrpms vs rpmfusion ??

[Axel Thimm]

On Sat, Nov 08, 2008 at 08:32:51AM -0600, Brian Millett wrote:
> So I gather that the best approach is to use priorities and determine
> which repo I want to have a higher priority to avoid conflict?

Actually I think priorities/weighing/scoring etc. are all ill
defined. Search for partial/selective enabling of repos for further
details.

The real answer is that repos need to cooperate for users to enable
them together. If the repo maintainers can't sort it out, how are end
users supposed to do that?

Having said that many (power) users manage very well with the
filtering they employ. But once you do so, please make sure you check
every bug you find that it is not induced by this per host
configuration.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20081109/4a7a5848/attachment.bin