[ATrpms-users] dl.atrpms.net down?

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 10:46:34PM +0100, John Robinson wrote:
> On 01/05/2008 17:34, David Rees wrote:
> > Yes, but my point remains - instead of being primarily memory limited
> > like Apache,
> 
> Apache isn't really all that much of a memory hog. Its processes 
> apparently being 30M in size doesn't mean they're 30M each; most of it's 
> shared, and individually the amount of memory they use when they're 
> serving non-dynamic content is minimal.

top says ~500m VIRT and ~60m RES, I take it that each process eats
about 60m.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20080502/b3a410da/attachment.bin