[ATrpms-users] dl.atrpms.net down?

[John Robinson]

On 01/05/2008 17:34, David Rees wrote:
> Yes, but my point remains - instead of being primarily memory limited
> like Apache,

Apache isn't really all that much of a memory hog. Its processes 
apparently being 30M in size doesn't mean they're 30M each; most of it's 
shared, and individually the amount of memory they use when they're 
serving non-dynamic content is minimal.

Cheers,

John.