[ATrpms-users] dl.atrpms.net down?

[xyon]

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:21 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 10:15:00PM -0400, xyon wrote:
> > Thank you, it is better.
> > 
> > Unfortunately I am now faced with a dilemma. My typical first actions
> > when putting together a fresh server is to add ATRpms to yum repos,
> > install apt via yum, then add the atrpms repo to the apt sources.list. 
> > 
> > Since I skipped atrpms during the recent install of a server, I am faced
> > with installing atrpm's apt after centos's. I am currently faced with
> > the below problem, and a bit afraid to go further:
> > 
> > # apt-get install apt
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following extra packages will be installed:
> >   libbeecrypt6 librpm4.4 neon popt pythonabi rpm rpm-python
> > The following packages will be upgraded
> >   apt popt rpm rpm-python
> > The following packages will be REPLACED:
> >   rpm-libs (by librpm4.4)
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> >   libbeecrypt6 librpm4.4 neon pythonabi
> > 4 upgraded, 4 newly installed, 1 replaced, 0 removed and 10 not
> > upgraded.
> > Need to get 0B/3155kB of archives.
> > After unpacking 1309kB of additional disk space will be used.
> > Do you want to continue? [Y/n]  
> > Committing changes...
> > Preparing...                ###########################################
> > [100%]
> >         file /usr/lib/libbeecrypt.so.6 from install of
> > libbeecrypt6-4.1.2-10.1_14.el4.at conflicts with file from package
> > beecrypt-3.1.0-6
> > E: Error while running transaction
> > 
> > All packages so far have been installed via centos' official
> > repositories. Is there a "safe" way across this?
> 
> Compatibility between CentOS/Scientific Linux/other clones
> etc. with3rd party repos is something we work on. For now just make a
> choice and stick with it.

Understood. ATRpms has a lot to offer, but that box does not have more
than one or two roles, so the demand on extra packages will be low.

> 
> BTW since this is a fresh install why use CentOS4 and not CentOS5?

Excellent point. Next box I'll go with CentOS5.

Thanks for the suggestions.

> 
> > On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 00:56 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 03:36:34PM -0500, john bray wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 15:41 -0400, xyon wrote:
> > > > > I'm having trouble connecting to Atrpms. It's hanging on connect and/or
> > > > > getting Headers. Anyone else having this issue?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > yah, same here.  i guess there are problems there just now.
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > actually the problem is mythdora users using download accelerators. I
> > > tuned the filters a bit and it should be better now.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrpms-users mailing list
> > atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>