[ATrpms-users] Trouble with zaptel-1.4.8

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 12:50:56PM -0800, David Rees wrote:
> On Jan 30, 2008 2:24 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > They are filtered out and moved to a different location. The repo view
> > usually contains only the latest. Unless there is known reason to keep
> > the last or more around. For example for mythtv bleeding I'm keeping
> > always the previous version in case the latest trunk code breaks
> > something. Same for zaptel now, I injected the zaptel 1.4.7.1 specfile
> > back into the system and it resurrected the old packages (building
> > some new for the latest F8/F9 kernels as well).
> 
> OK, that makes sense. How long does it usually take for the packages
> to show up again after reinjecting the spec file?

They do so on the next repo update, so usually once a day.

> > The mid term intent is to really purge away packages that have been
> > removed that way from the repo view. E.g. if some package has been
> > moved away for some time and noone reports a bad issue with the new
> > package within some sane timeframe then the old package can go.
> 
> Yep, that makes sense, too. Not a whole lot of use normally in keeping
> the old packages around (though with Fedora you can in theory download
> any build through their Koji build system which is pretty slick).

I still keep all my old specfiles since 2000 around ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20080131/3b0229ed/attachment.bin