[ATrpms-users] Trouble with zaptel-1.4.8
drees76 at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 21:50:56 CET 2008
On Jan 30, 2008 2:24 AM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> They are filtered out and moved to a different location. The repo view
> usually contains only the latest. Unless there is known reason to keep
> the last or more around. For example for mythtv bleeding I'm keeping
> always the previous version in case the latest trunk code breaks
> something. Same for zaptel now, I injected the zaptel 126.96.36.199 specfile
> back into the system and it resurrected the old packages (building
> some new for the latest F8/F9 kernels as well).
OK, that makes sense. How long does it usually take for the packages
to show up again after reinjecting the spec file?
> The mid term intent is to really purge away packages that have been
> removed that way from the repo view. E.g. if some package has been
> moved away for some time and noone reports a bad issue with the new
> package within some sane timeframe then the old package can go.
Yep, that makes sense, too. Not a whole lot of use normally in keeping
the old packages around (though with Fedora you can in theory download
any build through their Koji build system which is pretty slick).
More information about the atrpms-users