[ATrpms-users] MythTV Compile dependency issues
mitchell.gore at gmail.com
Sun Jan 6 23:19:17 CET 2008
On Jan 6, 2008 4:08 PM, Mitch Gore <mitchell.gore at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 6, 2008 3:36 PM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 02:24:56PM -0600, Mitch Gore wrote:
> > > I used to use the bleeding packages but due to a bug i was helpeing
> > test i
> > > moved to SVN. I wouldnt have a issue moving back to the bleeding
> > packages
> > > now but will it work with my current DB?
> > >
> > > [myth at mythtv ~]$ mythbackend --version
> > > Source code version : 15334
> > The bleeding packages are a tad older, 15333.
> > > I assume it will since it is as new as you say but just want to check.
> > You should check out the changeset 15334 - it is not likely that a db
> > change occured in that little time window, but also not impossible.
> > > Also, do i need to remove the SVN that i have installed
> > Yes.
> > > or can i just run yum the bleeding packages and they will do there
> > > job at replacing the correct files?
> > No, that's a bad thing about non-packages files - no one can identify
> > them anymore w/o substantial effort (like checking each and every file
> > under /usr whether it is in the rpm db or not and if it is whether it
> > matches its checksum there.
> > If you're lucky you installed everything under /usr/local, so it's
> > also quite easy to remove it in one sweep (unless you installed more
> > stuff under /usr/local you don't want to waste).
> > --
> > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> Yes i did install everything in /usr/local. I haven't installed anything
> manually in those directories. So can i just rm /usr/local/* and that will
> be it?
> Ill check the changes to see if there are any in the Database, if there
> are how long will it be before the bleeding packages are upgraded to
> changset 15334 or higher?
> Thank you for the help Axel. I know this is getting off topic of ATrpms
It doesnt appear there were any DB changes made:
Refs #4327 <http://svn.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/4327>. Another UK EIT fixup
update from JohnP.
This is based upon his eitfixup8 patch with a few
bits from eitfixup9 to fix a problem where the titles
were being completely blatted. I've also added a check
to make sure that the partnumber is not greater than
the parttotal. This stops things like 24/7 being
caught as a partnumber/parttotal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-users