[ATrpms-users] libdvdnav conflict between mplayer and vlc
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
atrpms at kosowsky.org
Tue Feb 5 01:10:59 CET 2008
Latest version of mplayer from atrpms installs libdvdnav (from
updates) for dependencies.
This however conflicts with the existing libdvdnav4 (from atrpms) that
was installed by vlc for dependencies.
Specifically:
yum update mplayer
...
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package mplayer.i386 4:1.0-63_rc2.fc8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libdvdnavmini.so.4 for package: mplayer
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libdvdnav.i386 0:4.1.1-2.fc8 set to be updated
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Changes in packages about to be updated:
mplayer - 4:1.0-63_rc2.fc8.i386
* Fri Feb 1 05:00:00 2008 Paulo Roma <roma at lcg.ufrj.br> 1.0-63_rc2
- Patched for being pulseaudio compatible.
- Fixed 4 vulnerabilities found in the 1.0rc2 version.
Dependencies Resolved
=============================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository
Size
=============================================================================
Updating:
mplayer i386 4:1.0-63_rc2.fc8 atrpms
13 M
Installing for dependencies:
libdvdnav i386 4.1.1-2.fc8 updates
84 k
Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install 1 Package(s)
Update 1 Package(s)
Remove 0 Package(s)
Total download size: 13 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/libdvdnav.so.4 from install of
libdvdnav-4.1.1-2.fc8.i386 conflicts with file from package
libdvdnav4-0.1.10-2.fc8.i386
Error Summary
-------------
Also:
rpm -q libdvdnav4
libdvdnav4-0.1.10-2.fc8
rpm -q --whatrequires libdvdnav4
no package requires libdvdnav4
rpm -e libdvdndav4
error: Failed dependencies:
libdvdnav.so.4 is needed by (installed)
vlc-0.8.6d-21.1.fc8.i386
I believe the problem is that libdvdnav (from updates) and libdvdnav4
(from atrpms) are in fact duplicate packages.
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list