[ATrpms-users] FC7 Dependency Resolution problem.
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Wed Oct 31 04:00:28 CET 2007
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:47:08PM -0400, Jason Sullivan wrote:
> I've installed the "skip-broken" plugin, but I'm still having
> problems updating to the latest kernel. First I tried it without
> skip-broken....
>
> [root at localhost ~]# yum update
> Loading "skip-broken" plugin
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package kernel.i686 0:2.6.23.1-10.fc7 set to be updated
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I read this as yum trying to uninstall 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 otherwise it
should say set to be installed. Isn't 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 your running
kernel? If so then this could break havoc on your system and you need
to investigate why yum is trying to do that.
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> madwifi-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> fuse-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> madwifi-hal-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> Error: Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed by
> package madwifi-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> Error: Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed by
> package fuse-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> Error: Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed by
> package madwifi-hal-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
This all means that yum was going to uninstall 2.6.22.9-91.fc7.
>
> ...then with...
>
> [root at localhost ~]# yum --skip-broken update
> Loading "skip-broken" plugin
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> **** Checking packages for dependency problems
> **** Checking for dep problems : kernel - 2.6.23.1-10.fc7.i686
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package kernel.i686 0:2.6.23.1-10.fc7 set to be updated
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> madwifi-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> fuse-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Processing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 for package:
> madwifi-hal-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> **** Failed
> **** Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed
> by package madwifi-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> **** Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed
> by package fuse-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> **** Missing Dependency: /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 is needed
> by package madwifi-hal-kmdl-2.6.22.9-91.fc7
> **** Checking for dep problems : kernel - 2.6.22.9-91.fc7.i686
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
> **** OK : kernel.i686 0-2.6.22.9-91.fc7 - None
> **** Packages with dependency resolving errors
> **** kernel - 2.6.23.1-10.fc7.i686
> **** 2
> **** 2
> **** 2
> **** End Checking packages for dependency problems
> --> Running transaction check
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
> =============================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> =============================================================================
>
> Transaction Summary
> =============================================================================
> Install 0 Package(s)
> Update 0 Package(s)
> Remove 0 Package(s)
>
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
> Finished Transaction Test
> Transaction Test Succeeded
> Running Transaction
>
> Complete!
> [root at localhost ~]#
>
> ...as they say on the internets, "Wait, what?"
skip-broken saved your system from nuking the running (?)
kernel. Maybe you have some test kernels installed? I thinnk the following is the cause:
installonly_limit
Number of packages listed in installonlypkgs to keep installed
at the same time. Setting to 0 disables this feature. Default is
’2’.
Set this to a higher number or to 0 and try again. If that succeeds
please file a bug against yum at bugzilla.redhat.com to indicate need
for adjustment of the default value of this parameter. Seems to bit
quite a lot of people lately.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20071031/6f23dabb/attachment-0001.bin
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list