[ATrpms-users] Issue with mythtv-suite and CentOS 5.0

[Jeff Guerdat]

Axel Thimm wrote:

> Yes and no. I moved all packages that would replace a Red Hat provides
> package into "testing" as I wanted to keep "stable" free of replacing
> packages.
> 
> I'm not a believer of "if it doesn't replace a vendor package then it
> can't do harm, can it?"-nonsense, but I wanted to seal this source of
> FUD. The drawback is that until I provide a dual provisioning model
> I'm abusing "testing" for that.

Why are there fuse packages in stable?  I ended up blocking them in 
yum/yumex because it wouldn't simply replace the Red Hat package but it 
would install the kmdls, which I didn't want.  It's not a problem at the 
moment since the Red Hat version finally jumped over what you are 
providing but for a while you were always providing fuse that was one 
minor step ahead of Red Hat...

-- 
Jeff Guerdat

We have just enough religion to make us hate, but not enough
to make us love one another.
                                               Jonathan Swift