[ATrpms-users] FC5 to FC8 upgrade attempt
Neil Bird
neil at fnxweb.com
Fri Nov 30 11:08:11 CET 2007
Around about 27/11/07 11:49, Axel Thimm typed ...
> BTW thin kabout moving to RHEL5/CentOS5 if you are on FC5. It means
> that you don't upgrade that often (FC5->F8 is 1.5 years), and that
> cycle is the same as RHEL's so you might be better off following
> RHEL's/CentOS' cycle then.
Hmm, hadn't considered that ...
Would I get away with using a CentOS 'upgrade' on top of an FC5, do you
think? I don't *really* want to faff around re-installing my Myth settings
[yet], as there's usually already enough of a downtime just tidying up the
upgrade.
--
[neil at fnx ~]# rm -f .signature
[neil at fnx ~]# ls -l .signature
ls: .signature: No such file or directory
[neil at fnx ~]# exit
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list