[ATrpms-users] ATrpms Asterisk and spandsp -- Fedora or ATrpms

[Anthony Messina]

On Wednesday 21 November 2007 08:14:12 am Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 08:03:25AM -0600, Anthony Messina wrote:
> > When using Asterisk 1.4 from ATrpms, which spandsp rpms should be used?
> > The pre0.0.4 from Fedora's repo, or the 0.0.3 from ATrpms' repo?  Or does
> > it matter?
>
> When using ATrpms' split libraries it doesn't matter. But currently
> asterisk 1.4 is built w/o spandsp support at ATrpms as it is (or was?)
> quite broken for a long time.

thanks axel.  -a

-- 
Anthony -  http://messinet.com - http://messinet.com/~amessina/gallery
8F89 5E72 8DF0 BCF0 10BE 9967 92DC 35DC B001 4A4E
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20071121/563fd435/attachment.bin