[ATrpms-users] mythmusic error???

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:02:29PM -0600, hondaman wrote:
> I have run into this problem now with F8rc3
> 
> I have installed faad2-2.5-7.fc7_92, however I still get the error:
> 
> Missing Dependency: libmp4ff.so.0() (64bit) is needed by the package mythmusic

What does rpm -q --provides faad2-2.5-7.fc7_92 say?

> On 8/5/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 03:31:48PM -0400, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > > Thanks Kim.
> > > I think the problem is that I am using the freshrpms version of faad2
> > > which strictly only has the libfaad binaries (plus documentation)
> > > while libmp4ff is supported elsewhere (reportedly in extras?) but I
> > > am not sure where.
> >
> > No, the problem is not (only) a rearangement of files within packages,
> > but also that some files are not being installed, because the
> > maintainer did not need them. But mythmusic needs them.
> >
> > > I believe that in general atrpms and freshrpms/dries/newrpms/etc are
> > > trying to be compatible but here is clearly one missing area.
> > >
> > > I could of course try to move more of my multimedia stuff over to
> > > atrpms but would prefer not to do that until next time I rebuild my
> > > system from scratch.
> > >
> > > So 2 questions:
> > > 1. Barring converting over some/most/all of my multimedia stuff to
> > >    atrpms, does anyone know where I could find an rpm with libmp4ff
> > >    consistent with freshrpms?
> >
> > faad2-2.5-7.fc7 from ATrpms will work with both ATrpms' bits and
> > freshrpms'.
> >
> > > 2. Is there a way to resolve this incompatible packaging between
> > >    atrpms and freshrpms going forward?
> >
> > Well, the maintainer that kicked away libmp4ff knows about the
> > mythmusic issue since years now (see the bug reports quoted).
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > Kim Bisgaard wrote at about 10:16:26 +0200 on Sunday, August 5, 2007:
> > >  > If you want mythmusic you need to install faad2 package from atrpms:
> > >  > yum install faad2
> > >  >
> > >  > You can see if there are other libraries you need for mythmusic with
> > >  > this command:
> > >  > ldd /usr/lib/mythtv/plugins/libmythmusic.so|grep -i not
> > >  >
> > >  > Regards,
> > >  > Kim
> > >  >
> > >  > Kim Bisgaard wrote:
> > >  > > Hi Jeffrey,
> > >  > >
> > >  > > I was under the impression that you did not have and did not want
> > >  > > mythmusic installed - sorry.
> > >  > >
> > >  > > As I discovered yesterday, i another thread, we also need to do this
> > >  > > (but it will not help with your mythmusic problems, though):
> > >  > > rpm -e --nodeps libmyth
> > >  > > yum install libmyth-0.20.1_0 libmythtv-0.20.1_0
> > >  > > libmythavformat-0.20.1_0 libmythavcodec-0.20.1_0 libmythupnp-0.20.1_0
> > >  > > libmythlivemedia-0.20.1_0 libmythavutil-0.20.1_0 libmythfreemheg-0.20.1_0
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Regards,
> > >  > > Kim
> > >  > >
> > >  > > Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> > >  > >> Kim Bisgaard wrote at about 10:42:42 +0200 on Thursday, August 2, 2007:
> > >  > >>  > Axel: If you re-read the original posting - it's about the mythtv
> > >  > >>  > package going from doc-package to group-package.
> > >  > >>  >  > Jeffrey: try this to get around the problem:
> > >  > >>  > rpm -e --nodeps --repackage mythtv
> > >  > >>  > yum install mythtv-doc
> > >  > >>  > yum upgrade libmyth mythtv-backend mythtv-frontend mythcontrols
> > >  > >> mythweb  > mythtv-themes mythtv-setup
> > >  > >>  >  > Regards,
> > >  > >>  > Kim
> > >  > >>  >  > Kim,
> > >  > >> The above sequence of commands worked fine without dependency
> > >  > >> conflicts (I also added myth-music to the final command sequence).
> > >  > >>
> > >  > >> HOWEVER, when I tried 'yum update' again, I got the same dependency
> > >  > >> error
> > >  > >>     Error: Missing Dependency: libmp4ff.so.0 is needed by package
> > >  > >> mythmusic
> > >  > >>
> > >  > >> But, then when I tried the 'yum upgrade <myth packages>'
> > >  > >> command again, I got the message:
> > >  > >>         No Packages marked for Update/Obsoletion
> > >  > >>
> > >  > >> I'm not sure I understand what is going on here...
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20071107/69d1a9d9/attachment.bin