[ATrpms-users] Is kmod-ntfs still necessary or helpful if using ntfs-3g?

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

On 11/6/07, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky <atrpms at kosowsky.org> wrote:
>
> Specifically, I have been using ntfs-3g to mount, read/write, etc. my
> ntfs partitions for more than a year now.
>
> I believe that kmod-ntfs represents the 'old' way of reading (but not
> writing) ntfs files in the pre-ntfs-3g days.
>
> Is there any need or reason to still keep kmod-ntfs on my system if I
> am using ntfs-3g?



No.


-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20071106/4df70bba/attachment.html