[ATrpms-users] no mythtv and ffmpeg packages for ppc on fc6

Bas Hulsken bhulsken at hotmail.com
Thu Jun 28 00:24:04 CEST 2007




>From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net>
>Reply-To: ATrpms user list <atrpms-users at ATrpms.net>
>To: Bas Hulsken <bhulsken at hotmail.com>
>CC: ATrpms user list <atrpms-users at ATrpms.net>
>Subject: Re: no mythtv and ffmpeg packages for ppc on fc6
>Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 17:05:49 +0200
>
>On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 06:02:14PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2007 at 10:03:59AM +0000, Bas Hulsken wrote:
> > > For the last two months or so, fc6-ppc packages for mythtv and ffmpeg 
>are
> > > missing. Is there a problem with building them? I've been building 
>mythtv
> > > from source for a long time on my mac-mini, but I find the atrpms 
>packages
> > > more convenient, considering the long build time on the mini. Perhaps 
>I can
> > > help getting mythtv to build? Unfortunately I don't know how to build 
>the
> > > .src.rpm packages from atrpms.. I guess I need some macros or 
>something?
> >
> > For the kmdls Paulo pointed you to the instructions/macros, but for
> > mythtv/ffmpeg etc you don't really need anything fancy.
> >
> > But ffmpeg is available for ppc. But mythtv fails due to missing
> > mjpegtools, which are due to missing libquicktime, which is due to
> > broken packages in fedora (the libmp4v2 pseudo package in Fedora ....)
> >
> > :/
>
>I did some heavy work-around and now you have package for ppc. Perhaps
>too many:
>
>http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/mythtv-suite/  0.20 old
>http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/mythtv/        0.20 new (in testing)
>http://atrpms.net/dist/fc6/mythtv-trunk/  0.21 (in bleeding)
>
>I woudn't mind some success/failure reports on these. The recommended
>version is "0.20 new", and testing 0.21 gives you extra bonuses. :=)
>("0.20" = 0.20.1 + fixes)
>--
>Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net


><< attach3 >>


Hi Axel,

thanks a lot! I've tested 0.20 old, which works like a charm. This weekend 
I'll have some time to test 0.20 new. I'll let you know how that goes. 
Testing 0.21 will be difficult for me I'm afraid...  I have very little 
time, and as far as I know, I have to run a 0.21 backend to test, which will 
not coexist with a 0.20 backend. And this is a production system, my 
girlfriend will kill me if I break the tv again ;-) Sorry for that.

thanks again!
Bas

_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail to go? Get your Hotmail, news, sports and much more! 
http://mobile.msn.com




More information about the atrpms-users mailing list