[ATrpms-users] libmyth for fglrx
Kevin J. Cummings
cummings at kjchome.homeip.net
Mon Jun 25 17:32:10 CEST 2007
Axel Thimm wrote:
> But rants aside try using smart as follows:
>
> smart update
> smart fix
-bash: smart: command not found
so I guess I don't have smart installed and configured on this lappie.
I'm "supposed" to be using a vendor supplied update script, but I
slogged through it and started using yum repos whereever possible.
I probably have more repos configured than I need to (3 of them contain
a subset which entirely overlap).
The last time I tried to install configure smart on my FC5 system, I
gave up due to not understanding the repo-lingo sufficiently to make
intelligent decisions in setting up 3rd party repos that worked right.
My history is that I used to install RPMs by hand during my RHL days.
In my first Fedora installation (FC2), I installed and learned how to
use synaptic. It was very useful to help me clean up my very old legacy
packages (some I wished to keep, some I needed to punt). I migrated to
yum soon thereafter when yum became the default (was that FC3?) I tried
smart, but decided to let it wait when I couldn't make it do everything
I wanted it to for me. (ie I couldn't configure it correctly.)
> And see how smart will (mostly) suggest the right steps to perform.
I wish smart would "auto-configure" itself for each repo! *that* would
be useful!
>>> A runtime check would be best, of course, but that's a request to make
>>> to the mythtv developers.
>> I figured as much. I think that the Myth Devs would probably prefer it
>> if the video drivers got it right in the first place! Which is why I
>> was asking here.
>
> You mean here is where ATI developers lurk around and will pick up
> this suggestion? :)
"not exactly." I figured I'd run it past you and see what you were
willing to do before filing an RFE and discovering it was a waste of
time. B^)
>> I was assuming that just providing a 2nd package (say libmyth-fglrx) and
>> have the user rpm --erase libmyth (maybe with --nodeps) and install the
>> replacement by hand. Perhaps even uninstall the mythtv-suite meta
>> package to prevent the old libmyth from being brought back in by
>> updates. Maybe I haven't thought things through far enough.
>
> libmyth updates are not brought in by mythtv-suite, they are brought
> in automatically. And an upgrade to the next mythtv rpm release would
> require both packages to exist somehow in the repo, with both
> providing the same (packging) interface, but still no coinstallable
> and not cross-upgradable. It's a corner case that rpm/yum/etc cannot
> solve.
grumble.
> Oh, and libmyth and mythtv-suite are history anyway. See the versions
> in testing and bleeding. :)
> (not that it matters in this context)
Another bridge to cross when I get to it I suppose!
>>> I checked mythtv's tickets and no one ever requested to make the static
>>> USE_* flagg to a runtime flag. Actually in the tickets it is only
>>> mentioned once only, and in a different context, so most probably the
>>> flag hasn't become runtime yet due to lack of demand?
>> Do you have the MythTV ticket number for the one which resulted in this
>> flag being added? I suppose I can go and try and search for it myself.
>
> No, I don't, but it wasn't really relevant, just a developer asking a
> user to test it for another driver.
And lest I be remiss in my courtesy, thanks for all the hard work you do
providing all the addon packages to help make my Fedora experience better!
--
Kevin J. Cummings
kjchome at rcn.com
cummings at kjchome.homeip.net
cummings at kjc386.framingham.ma.us
Registered Linux User #1232 (http://counter.li.org)
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list