[ATrpms-users] Problems building dovecot-1.0.0-8_56.src.rpm on RHEL3

Scott A. Hughes sahughes at sanguine.net
Thu Jun 14 03:53:21 CEST 2007


Hello Axel.

I ran out of time earlier to test build the RPMs within my own environment, and
started to look at them in detail today. Please see below for comment.

> On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 09:20:03AM +0900, Scott A. Hughes wrote:
>> Hello again.
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 07:30:55PM +0900, Scott A. Hughes wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:22:10PM +0900, Scott A. Hughes wrote:
>> >> >> Taking the build options on the following URI as a guideline I have
>> >> successfully
>> >> >> built Dovecot 1.0.0 on RHEL4 using the dovecot-1.0.0-8_56.src.rpm source
>> rpm.
>> >
>> >> >> However, the build fails when done on a RHEL3 system.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> + libtoolize -f
>> >> >> libtoolize: `/usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' is serial 46, less than 48 in
>> >> >> `aclocal.m4'
>> >
>> >> > this is a side-effect at people yelling at ATrpms for replacing
>> >> > packages from the system:
>> >>
>> >> The pros and cons have no doubt been discussed here before, so I will refrain
>> from
>> >> commenting in detail, but will say that personally, I have no problem with such
>> >> replacements. I appreciate your pro-active approach. (After all, it would be
>> this
>> >> thinking that gives impetus to your work on the RPMs in the first place). I too
>> >> adopt this approach with my server environments and those of my clients.
>> >>
>> >> > I'm using newer autotools than what RHEL3
>> >>
>> >> Ah, that explains it.
>> >>
>> >> > ships comparable to what RHEL5 ships. With autotools its always a good
>> >> > idea to use the latest even for older platforms.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I agree.
>> >>
>> >> > Still people didn't like these packages being superseeded and
>> >> > therefore they are currently not published. I can place them somewhere
>> >> > for you do download, perhaps under people.atrpms.net? I don't want to
>> >> > make them globally visible again, because people will start moaning
>> >> > about too many packages being replaced.
>> >>
>> >> That would be very much appreciated. Thank you Axel.
>> >>
>> >> I will send you a follow-up email off-list re' a download location.
>> >
>> > I've put them on http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/autotools-rhel3/
>> > This is public, but not globally visible, e.g. doesn't automatically
>> > install if you use ATrpms.
>> >
>> > (I've put all packages I use, you probably only need a couple)
>>
>> Thank you. I am sure other people will also find them useful.
>>
>> Can you please also upload the source RPMs?
>
> OK, done.

Thank you. After downloading and performing and rpm --checksig on them, I noticed
the following.

[sahughes at homer autotools-rhel3]$ rpm -K *.rpm | grep NOT
libtool-1.5.22-6.1_17.src.rpm: (sha1) dsa sha1 MD5 GPG NOT OK
[sahughes at homer autotools-rhel3]$

I think the above src.rpm on http://people.atrpms.net/~athimm/autotools-rhel3/ may
be corrupted. Can you please verify and replace if necessary?

Cheers,

Scott.

--




More information about the atrpms-users mailing list