[ATrpms-users] mythmusic error???

Jeffrey J. Kosowsky atrpms at kosowsky.org
Tue Jul 31 03:47:33 CEST 2007


Paulo Cavalcanti wrote at about 23:28:26 -0300 on Sunday, July 29, 2007:
 > > > [cascavel:~] rpm -qf /usr/lib64/libmp4ff.so.0
 > > > faad2-2.5-7.fc6.at
 > > >
 > > > Check your version of faad2.
 > > >
 > >
 > > I am using the version of faad2 provided by freshrpms:
 > >   faad2-2.5-2.fc6
 > > The freshrpms version of faad2 clearly doesn't contain 'libmp4ff'.
 > >
 > > Until this latest mythtv update, I never had any compatibility issues.
 > > While I imagine that switching to the atrpms version would solve my
 > > problems, it would be nice if the two repos (atrpms and freshrpms)
 > > agreed on the core contents of faad2. Particularly, since I otherwise
 > > have a mixed atrpms and freshrpms system.
 > >
 > > Any idea what changed to uncover this incompatibility?
 > 
 > 
 > Matthias removed libmp4ff from faad2 and moved it to another package.
 > I think it is part of extras now.

Well, if it is part of 'extras' which in turn is merged with core as
of FC7, wouldn't it make sense for atrpms to drop it too?

 > In a nutshell, I would gather all multimedia packages from a single repo,
 > preferably from ATrpms
 > (faad2, faac, x264, ffmpeg, transcode, mjpegtools and libquicktime).
 > 
 > This will not preclude you from using other packages from freshrpms.
 > The only package I know that could require multimedia packages
 > from freshrpms is vlc, which is also available in ATrpms now
 > (and it is as good as Livna's or freshrpms versions).
 > 
 > -- 
 > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
 > LCG - UFRJ



More information about the atrpms-users mailing list