[ATrpms-users] ScientificPython won't install on RH 3 system

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:27:14PM -0700, Michael Hannon wrote:
> Greetings.  We've gotten a request to install Scientific Python on one 
> of the linux workstations here.  The system in question is actually 
> running Scientific Linux version 3, which is compiled (mostly) from the 
> source for Redhat Enterprise 3.
> 
> I downloaded the following RPM files from the AT repository, using, for 
> example:
> 
>   wget http://dl.atrpms.net/all/ScientificPython-2.4.11-2.el3.at.i386.rpm
> 
> [root at xxxxxx tmp]# ls
> netcdf-3.6.2-5.el3.i386.rpm        pythonabi-2.2-3.el3.at.i386.rpm
> netcdf-devel-3.6.2-5.el3.i386.rpm 
> ScientificPython-2.4.11-2.el3.at.i386.rpm
> Numeric-23.8-5.el3.at.i386.rpm
> 
> There seems to be an incompatibility between this version of 
> ScientificPython and this version of netcdf:
> 
> [root at xxxxxx tmp]# rpm -Uvh *
> warning: netcdf-3.6.2-5.el3.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 
> 66534c2b
> error: Failed dependencies:
>          libnetcdf.so.3 is needed by ScientificPython-2.4.11-2.el3.at
> 
> [root at xxxxxx tmp]# rpm -ql -p netcdf-3.6.2-5.el3.i386.rpm | grep 
> libnetcdf.so
> warning: netcdf-3.6.2-5.el3.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 
> 66534c2b
> /usr/lib/libnetcdf.so.4
> /usr/lib/libnetcdf.so.4.0.0
> 
> Any suggestions?  Thanks.

I built new ScientificPython 2.6 packages that will appear in the repo
very soon (but not that soon on the website). Do you really need 2.4,
or would the 2.6 suffice (I will schedule 2.4 packages next anyway)?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070712/7916603c/attachment.bin