[ATrpms-users] error: ... Forbidden

[Max Waterman]

Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 09:35:45AM +0800, Max Waterman wrote:
>   
>> Of course, I had seen the messages, though, strangely, nothing I'd call
>> an announcement (perhaps I'm not on an 'announce' list or something) ...
>>     
>
> http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-announce/2006-August/000017.html
> http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-announce/2006-December/000020.html
>   
I'm still waiting for my download to complete - and I'm selecting 
mirrors in Asia too :(

...it's still not clear to me why smart tells me daily that there are 
updates, including atrpm specific ones, and yet it won't let me install 
them.

I would have expected for smart to just eventually consistently say 
there are no updates, rather than to produce errors when it tries to 
download them.

Is this really the correct behaviour?

> Updating cache...               
> ######################################## [100%]
>
> Computing transaction...
>
> Upgrading packages (26):
>   DCC                       libavc1394-devel          
> libraw1394_8             
>   amule                     libavc1394_0              
> librom1394_0             
>   atrpms-package-config     libavc1394_0              
> librom1394_0             
>   faac                      libcdaudio                
> medley-package-config    
>   faac-devel                libiec61883_0             
> mod_jk                   
>   lame                      libraw1394                
> python-imaging           
>   lame-devel                libraw1394                
> razor-agents             
>   libavc1394                libraw1394-devel          
> rdiff-backup             
>   libavc1394                libraw1394_8             
>
> Downgrading packages (1):
>   PIL 
>
> Installing packages (1):
>   libmp3lame0 
>
> 7.2MB of package files are needed. 2.0MB will be used.
>
> Confirm changes? (Y/n):

Max.
>   
>> I have been 'umming and ahhing' over whether to do a fresh install onto
>> 2 new (well, unused) disks in RAID1, or just upgrade my aging single
>>     
>
>   
>> Advice?
>>     
>
> This was discussed in probably three threads on this list by
> now. Check the archives. :)
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070117/8c351be9/attachment.html