[ATrpms-users] Upgrade to FC6: almost painless

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Jan 16 00:23:18 CET 2007


On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 03:08:28PM -0600, Keith C wrote:
> I probably shouldn't even admit that i didn't write the architecture  
> on my install DVDs and accidentally used the 386 installer over top  
> of a x86_64 fc5 install.  Needless to say, I was then in line for a  
> clean install.

Didn't the i386 installer detect that it was going to "upgrade" a 64
bit system? I guess that's worth filing it with bugzilla.redhat.com.
Even if that were the user's intention a warning would had been in
order.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070116/e9d2bead/attachment.bin 


More information about the atrpms-users mailing list