[ATrpms-users] nvidia 9764 wfb module

Paul mylists at wilsononline.id.au
Sat Jan 6 00:19:06 CET 2007


Manually created symlink:

ln -s /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-1.0-9746_drv.so nvidia_drv.so
and removed bad symlink
rm nvidia_drv.o

rebooted and nvidia loaded ok


but still no-go for the wfb module:

(II) Loading sub module "wfb"
(II) LoadModule: "wfb"
(WW) Warning, couldn't open module wfb
(II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
(EE) Failed to load module "wfb" (module does not exist, 0)

Perphaps this is related to this issue?

BTW I don't have a 8800 so I can't really test the wfb anyway just testing the new package

thanks
Paul
On 6/01/2007 10:01 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:57:42AM +1100, Paul wrote:
>> Here is my output:>
>>
>> [root at mythbox X11]# ls -l /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv*
>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 87676 Sep  1 04:19 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv_drv.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    38 Jan  6 09:24 
>> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-1.0-9746_drv.so -> nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    51 Jan  6 09:24 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o -> 
>> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-1.0-9746_drv.o
> 
> you are missing /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so, which
> should be a symlink to
> /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so.
> 
> Upgrade to the latest nvidia-graphics-switch and use nvidia-graphics-switch 9746
> 
> 
>> On 6/01/2007 9:52 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:41:37AM +1100, Paul wrote:
>>>> Rebooted and couldn't load nvidia module:
>>>>
>>>> (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
>>>> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia
>>>> (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
>>>> (EE) Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0)
>>>>
>>>> Does this load it from the  /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/ directory?
>>> No, from /drivers/ - do you have similar output?
>>>
>>> $ ls -l /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so 
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      38 Jan  5 09:51 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so -> nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
>>> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1364816 Jan  5 06:21 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
>>>
>>>
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>> On 6/01/2007 9:27 AM, Paul wrote:
>>>>> I installed but it dragged 2 kmdl files?
>>>>> is that correct?
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan  6 09:24:02 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746-libs.i386 
>>>>> 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan  6 09:24:19 mythbox Updated: 
>>>>> nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2869.fc6.i686 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>>> Jan  6 09:24:20 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics-helpers.i386 
>>>>> 0.0.16-17.fc6.at
>>>>> Jan  6 09:24:56 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746.i386 
>>>>> 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>>> Jan  6 09:24:57 mythbox Updated: rrdtool-perl.i386 1.2.15-9.fc6
>>>>> Jan  6 09:25:02 mythbox Updated: 
>>>>> nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2868.fc6.i686 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/01/2007 1:50 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:20:54PM +1100, Paul wrote:
>>>>>>> the WFB module is new Axel .. not affecting me but FYI for 8800 cards..
>>>>>> Thanks, the issue is already known: 
>>>>>> http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm currently respinning completely new nvidia packages that will not
>>>>>> manually install anymore, but use nvidia-installer instead. It's a bit
>>>>>> involved becasue it requires root priviledges at build time and assume
>>>>>> installation will happen under /.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> see==> 
>>>>>>> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1119139#post1119139
>>>>>> Thanks for the URL, I'll post a follow-up.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm using the atrpms package for nvidia 9764 and I'm getting errors 
>>>>>>> finding wfb but I have a 6200 TC card, so I assume this is not a 
>>>>>>> problem, but should this library still exist? ie is this a packaging 
>>>>>>> problem or a configuration problem for me?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Quote:
>>>>>>> (II) Loading sub module "wfb"
>>>>>>> (II) LoadModule: "wfb"
>>>>>>> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module wfb
>>>>>>> (II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
>>>>>>> (EE) Failed to load module "wfb" (module does not exist, 0)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The file can be placed anywhere, as long as the X server can find it 
>>>>>>> (either through the ModulePath directive or via a symlink). The 
>>>>>>> SONAME is not used. The driver will automatically try to load a 
>>>>>>> module called "wfb" (i.e., libwfb.so), which is installed as a 
>>>>>>> symlink to libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z if no libwfb.so existed at install 
>>>>>>> time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The driver will always try to load it, but it will only be required 
>>>>>>> if a GeForce 8800 or higher is detected.
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>>>>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>>>>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
> 




More information about the atrpms-users mailing list