[ATrpms-users] nvidia 9764 wfb module

[Paul]

Here is my output:>

[root at mythbox X11]# ls -l /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 87676 Sep  1 04:19 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nv_drv.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    38 Jan  6 09:24 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-1.0-9746_drv.so -> nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root    51 Jan  6 09:24 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.o -> 
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-1.0-9746_drv.o



On 6/01/2007 9:52 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 09:41:37AM +1100, Paul wrote:
>> Rebooted and couldn't load nvidia module:
>>
>> (II) LoadModule: "nvidia"
>> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nvidia
>> (II) UnloadModule: "nvidia"
>> (EE) Failed to load module "nvidia" (module does not exist, 0)
>>
>> Does this load it from the  /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/ directory?
> 
> No, from /drivers/ - do you have similar output?
> 
> $ ls -l /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so 
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      38 Jan  5 09:51 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia_drv.so -> nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1364816 Jan  5 06:21 /usr/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/nvidia-graphics-1.0-9746/nvidia_drv.so
> 
> 
>> Paul
>>
>> On 6/01/2007 9:27 AM, Paul wrote:
>>> I installed but it dragged 2 kmdl files?
>>> is that correct?
>>>
>>> Jan  6 09:24:02 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746-libs.i386 
>>> 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>
>>> Jan  6 09:24:19 mythbox Updated: 
>>> nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2869.fc6.i686 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>> Jan  6 09:24:20 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics-helpers.i386 
>>> 0.0.16-17.fc6.at
>>> Jan  6 09:24:56 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746.i386 
>>> 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>> Jan  6 09:24:57 mythbox Updated: rrdtool-perl.i386 1.2.15-9.fc6
>>> Jan  6 09:25:02 mythbox Updated: 
>>> nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2868.fc6.i686 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/01/2007 1:50 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:20:54PM +1100, Paul wrote:
>>>>> the WFB module is new Axel .. not affecting me but FYI for 8800 cards..
>>>> Thanks, the issue is already known: 
>>>> http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
>>>>
>>>> I'm currently respinning completely new nvidia packages that will not
>>>> manually install anymore, but use nvidia-installer instead. It's a bit
>>>> involved becasue it requires root priviledges at build time and assume
>>>> installation will happen under /.
>>>>
>>>>> see==> 
>>>>> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1119139#post1119139
>>>> Thanks for the URL, I'll post a follow-up.
>>>>
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using the atrpms package for nvidia 9764 and I'm getting errors 
>>>>> finding wfb but I have a 6200 TC card, so I assume this is not a 
>>>>> problem, but should this library still exist? ie is this a packaging 
>>>>> problem or a configuration problem for me?
>>>>>
>>>>> Quote:
>>>>> (II) Loading sub module "wfb"
>>>>> (II) LoadModule: "wfb"
>>>>> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module wfb
>>>>> (II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
>>>>> (EE) Failed to load module "wfb" (module does not exist, 0)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The file can be placed anywhere, as long as the X server can find it 
>>>>> (either through the ModulePath directive or via a symlink). The 
>>>>> SONAME is not used. The driver will automatically try to load a 
>>>>> module called "wfb" (i.e., libwfb.so), which is installed as a 
>>>>> symlink to libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z if no libwfb.so existed at install 
>>>>> time.
>>>>>
>>>>> The driver will always try to load it, but it will only be required 
>>>>> if a GeForce 8800 or higher is detected.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> atrpms-users mailing list
>>>>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>>>>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>