[ATrpms-users] nvidia 9764 wfb module

[Paul]

I installed but it dragged 2 kmdl files?
is that correct?

Jan  6 09:24:02 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746-libs.i386 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at

Jan  6 09:24:19 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2869.fc6.i686 
1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
Jan  6 09:24:20 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics-helpers.i386 0.0.16-17.fc6.at
Jan  6 09:24:56 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746.i386 1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at
Jan  6 09:24:57 mythbox Updated: rrdtool-perl.i386 1.2.15-9.fc6
Jan  6 09:25:02 mythbox Updated: nvidia-graphics9746-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2868.fc6.i686 
1:1.0_9746-84.fc6.at



On 5/01/2007 1:50 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:20:54PM +1100, Paul wrote:
>> the WFB module is new Axel .. not affecting me but FYI for 8800 cards..
> 
> Thanks, the issue is already known: http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
> 
> I'm currently respinning completely new nvidia packages that will not
> manually install anymore, but use nvidia-installer instead. It's a bit
> involved becasue it requires root priviledges at build time and assume
> installation will happen under /.
> 
>> see==> http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=1119139#post1119139
> 
> Thanks for the URL, I'll post a follow-up.
> 
>> Paul
>>
>> I'm using the atrpms package for nvidia 9764 and I'm getting errors 
>> finding wfb but I have a 6200 TC card, so I assume this is not a 
>> problem, but should this library still exist? ie is this a packaging 
>> problem or a configuration problem for me?
>>
>> Quote:
>> (II) Loading sub module "wfb"
>> (II) LoadModule: "wfb"
>> (WW) Warning, couldn't open module wfb
>> (II) UnloadModule: "wfb"
>> (EE) Failed to load module "wfb" (module does not exist, 0)
>>
>>
>> The file can be placed anywhere, as long as the X server can find it 
>> (either through the ModulePath directive or via a symlink). The SONAME 
>> is not used. The driver will automatically try to load a module called 
>> "wfb" (i.e., libwfb.so), which is installed as a symlink to 
>> libnvidia-wfb.so.x.y.z if no libwfb.so existed at install time.
>>
>> The driver will always try to load it, but it will only be required if a 
>> GeForce 8800 or higher is detected.
> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> atrpms-users mailing list
>> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
>> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>