[ATrpms-users] fc4 packages to fc6

Jani Partanen jiipee at sotapeli.fi
Fri Jan 5 00:22:42 CET 2007


Just remove them, you don't need them.


Pelikaista / Mediatraffic Oy
Jani Partanen
Battlefield 2 admin
tel. +358 505 817 817
e-mail: jiipee at pelikaista.net jiipee at sotapeli.fi 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: atrpms-users-bounces at atrpms.net [mailto:atrpms-users-
> bounces at atrpms.net] On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 12:55 AM
> Cc: atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] fc4 packages to fc6
> 
> I'm progressively replacing these , some of these seem to have moved into
> "release" and/or
> changed name.
> others I have not idea eg
> 
> rhnlib-1.8-6.p24.1_8.rhfc4.at.noarch.rpm
> up2date-4.4.23-4_13.rhfc4.at.i386.rpm
> 
> there appears to be no FC6 package or its changed name to something else
> so I don't know
> if I should remove these or not
> 
> Thanks
> Paul
> 
> On 5/01/2007 3:10 AM, Philip R. Schaffner wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 08:27 +1100, Paul wrote:
> >> a yum update doesn't pick up any updates for these packages
> >> and a yum info picks up the fc4 version
> >
> > Looks a like you have a bunch of "orphan" FC4 packages for which there
> > is no direct FC6 equivalent.
> >
> > e.g. - on my FC6 system:
> >
> > # yum --enable \*rpm\* search libFLAC
> > Loading "installonlyn" plugin
> > Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
> > Loading "kmdl" plugin
> > Loading "kernel-module" plugin
> > Setting up repositories
> > atrpms                    100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > atrpms-testing            100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > atrpms-bleeding           100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > core                      100% |=========================| 1.3 kB
> 00:00
> > jpackage-generic          100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > flash                     100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > local                     100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > jpackage-fc               100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > jpackage-generic-nonfree  100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > updates                   100% |=========================| 1.2 kB
> 00:00
> > gstreamer                 100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > extras                    100% |=========================| 1.1 kB
> 00:00
> > rpmforge                  100% |=========================|  951 B
> 00:00
> > freshrpms                 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB
> 00:00
> > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> > Reading repository metadata in from local files
> > primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================| 1.7 MB
> 00:00
> > ################################################## 5384/5384
> > No Matches found
> > # locate libFLAC
> > /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5
> > /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5.0.0
> > /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7
> > /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7.0.0
> > # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5
> > flac-1.1.2-27.i386
> >
> > In an ideal world all the orphan packages would have been obsoleted or
> > upgraded.  There may well be others left that are not so nicely flagged.
> > Run "rpm -qa --last" (may want to redirect to a file or pipe to less)
> > and inspect the output for packages that predate FC6.  I'd try "yum
> > remove ..." or "rpm -e ...".  This is one reason why a fresh install is
> > generally recommended over an upgrade.
> >
> > Phil
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrpms-users mailing list
> > atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: jiipee at pelikaista.net.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 564 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070105/e2c6cfeb/attachment.vcf 


More information about the atrpms-users mailing list