[ATrpms-users] fc4 packages to fc6

Paul mylists at wilsononline.id.au
Thu Jan 4 23:55:20 CET 2007


I'm progressively replacing these , some of these seem to have moved into "release" and/or 
changed name.
others I have not idea eg

rhnlib-1.8-6.p24.1_8.rhfc4.at.noarch.rpm
up2date-4.4.23-4_13.rhfc4.at.i386.rpm

there appears to be no FC6 package or its changed name to something else so I don't know 
if I should remove these or not

Thanks
Paul

On 5/01/2007 3:10 AM, Philip R. Schaffner wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 08:27 +1100, Paul wrote:
>> a yum update doesn't pick up any updates for these packages
>> and a yum info picks up the fc4 version
> 
> Looks a like you have a bunch of "orphan" FC4 packages for which there
> is no direct FC6 equivalent.
> 
> e.g. - on my FC6 system:
> 
> # yum --enable \*rpm\* search libFLAC
> Loading "installonlyn" plugin
> Loading "fastestmirror" plugin
> Loading "kmdl" plugin
> Loading "kernel-module" plugin
> Setting up repositories
> atrpms                    100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> atrpms-testing            100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> atrpms-bleeding           100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> core                      100% |=========================| 1.3 kB    00:00
> jpackage-generic          100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> flash                     100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> local                     100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> jpackage-fc               100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> jpackage-generic-nonfree  100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> updates                   100% |=========================| 1.2 kB    00:00
> gstreamer                 100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> extras                    100% |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00
> rpmforge                  100% |=========================|  951 B    00:00
> freshrpms                 100% |=========================| 1.1 kB    00:00
> Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
> Reading repository metadata in from local files
> primary.xml.gz            100% |=========================| 1.7 MB    00:00
> ################################################## 5384/5384
> No Matches found
> # locate libFLAC
> /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5
> /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5.0.0
> /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7
> /usr/lib/libFLAC.so.7.0.0
> # rpm -qf /usr/lib/libFLAC++.so.5
> flac-1.1.2-27.i386
> 
> In an ideal world all the orphan packages would have been obsoleted or
> upgraded.  There may well be others left that are not so nicely flagged.
> Run "rpm -qa --last" (may want to redirect to a file or pipe to less)
> and inspect the output for packages that predate FC6.  I'd try "yum
> remove ..." or "rpm -e ...".  This is one reason why a fresh install is
> generally recommended over an upgrade.
> 
> Phil
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
> 




More information about the atrpms-users mailing list