[ATrpms-users] Problems updating faac - conflict with libmp4v2

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

Axel,

please read this old message:

http://lists.freshrpms.net/pipermail/freshrpms-list/2006-December/014376.html

I reported everything in freshrpms, but I think Matthias is on vacation.

Anyway, I fixed everything my way, but it is kind of messy.

/Paulo Roma.


On 1/2/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:15:49PM +0100, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 08:18:53AM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > > On 1/2/07, Javier Perez <pepebuho at pananet.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >Hi, I am having a conflict with the version of libmp4v2 that faac
> needs
> > > >and the one that I have installed.
> > > >Could you pls look into this, it seems more like a naming problem to
> > > >coordinate between ATrpms and RF.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have been using faac and faad2 from freshrpms because of vlc,
> > > which I compile myself
> > > (Dries' packages should be similar, I guess).
> > >
> > > However, Matthias said he is willing to pass libmp4v2 to extras,
> > > so he removed those libs from faad2. Also,
> > > /usr/lib/libmp4v2.so, needed by mythtv, was no longer in his faac
> package.
> >
> > It's libmp4ff. This is an old issue which started with livna and now
> > seems to have swapped over to freshrpms. See also
> > http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=832#c19 where I tried to
> > sync with livna and had mythtv broken.
> >
> > > The upgrade to version 2.5 broke ffmpeg, transcode and cinelerra
> > > from freshrpms.  I have reported those problems in freshrpms lists,
> > > but did not check if he fixed it I think he only updated ffmpeg for
> > > the new versions, which fixed transcode.  Cinelerra has to be
> > > recreated yet.
> > >
> > > Therefore, I start using faac and faad2 from ATrpms, and kept ffmpeg
> > > (15/12/2006) from freshrpms.
> > >
> > > It would be very nice if those packages were compatible again.
> >
> > Please ask Matthias to resurrect libmp4ff otherwise mythtv will
> > neither build, nor run.
>
> And I forgot to mention: There is no such thing as an upstream
> "libmp4v2" - it was artificially created by someone for patent issues
> and AFAIK was abandoned. E.g. there is no upstream backup for keeping
> a libmp4v2 self-standing library.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
>


-- 
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070102/5dee7e17/attachment.html