[ATrpms-users] Bug in atrpms version of bash-completion

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Dec 26, 2007 at 09:50:13AM -0500, Jeffrey J. Kosowsky wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote at about 11:38:57 +0200 on Wednesday, December 26, 2007:
>  > I didn't create this package this way, most probably it was part of
>  > ATrpms before it appeared in any Fedora repos (first package in ATrpms
>  > appeared 3 years ago, e.g. at F(8-2*3) ~= FC2 time, where there wasn't
>  > even a Fedora Extras).
>  > -- 
> 
> So is there any need to continue it as a separate ATRpms package if it
> just simply duplicates Fedora functionality? Seems like it then just
> adds work, storage requirements, and potential for additional bugs and
> confusion without any real benefits.

One would have to compare with what the Fedora maintainer is doing to
cast such a decision, but other than in Fedora I'm quite extensively
using it on RHEL. So even if the Fedora branch is turned off the
package will continue to be maintained.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20071227/a205849d/attachment.bin