[ATrpms-users] spamassassin
Jeffrey J. Kosowsky
atrpms at kosowsky.org
Thu Dec 13 07:59:12 CET 2007
Axel,
What is the difference between your version of spamassassin and the
standard Fedora version? Both appear to be based on version 3.2.3 of
the code?
Part of the reason I am asking is that ever since I have upgraded from
FC6 (with spamassassin-3.1.9-1.fc6) to FC8 (with
spamassassin-3.2.3-2.fc8), spamassassin has effectively stopped
working for me, giving both spam and non-spam alike scores of zero.
This is really annoying since I am now flooded by spam and was
interested whether your version (intentionally or not) fixes this
problem.
Note that the same bug seems to have been reported on bugzilla
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=392851) where some of the
respondents try to shift the blame to atrpms, presumably because the
original poster is a heavy atrpms user and the maintainers are not
able to reproduce the bug on their own non-atrpms system. While I'm
not at all sure how any of the atrpms would affect spamassassin, I am
curious since I too use atrpms. The only seemingly mail-related atrpms
that I have installed are:
razor-agents
perl-Mail-DomainKeys
DCC
perl-Mail-DKIM
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list