[ATrpms-users] fpga_load missing in zaptel.

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:47:26PM -0600, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Axel Thimm wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 01:34:45PM -0600, William F. Acker WB2FLW +1-303-722-7209 wrote:
> >>       When I rebuild the zaptel src rpm, I fail with the 'installed but
> >> unpackaged files error'.  It references fpga_load as well as its man-page.
> >> I guess the build-system that makes the binaries for release has the check
> >> for unpackaged files turned off.
> >
> > No, that would be heresy! :=)
> >
> > The real reason is that the src.rpm will be missing some BuildRequires
> > which happens to exist on your system. I think it's libusb-devel or
> > maybe something else.
> >
> >> Adding the entries to %files causes the build to complete with the
> >> two extra files packaged.  Since I don't have the hardware, I can't
> >> test to see if the program actually works, but I have no reason to
> >> believe that it wouldn't.
> >
> > Care to file this as a bugzilla? Add you pathc to the specfile with a
> > proper %changelog entry and bumping the release please, as
> > well. Thanks!
> >
> I have libusb-devel-0.1.12-7.fc7 on my system.  I'll see what I can do 
> about Bugzilla, I'm in text-mode only, but I hear 
> it's doable although difficult with Lynx.  However, if I could master it, I 
> have changes for Asterisk regarding the sound-files.  Come to think of it, 
> shouldn't they be in separate packages?

They were split upstream and then half-merged. There is some
licensing issue floating in the air for the rest, so I haven't tried
to do any splits yet.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20070824/8525ee04/attachment.bin