[ATrpms-users] Is "HID" a module or static?
George Galt
george.galt at gmail.com
Sun Sep 24 19:29:43 CEST 2006
Axel:
Thanks. I thought so. If I recompile the kernel with 'hid' as a
loadable module, do you have any ideas on how I could ensure (I
assumin in modprobe.conf) that the elo touchscreen driver loads ahead
of the 'hid' module? (I assume that I can just install the source rpm
and use the config file from there as the start of my own
configuration).
Sorry to ask such basic questions, but I don't really know anyone with
enough in-depth linux knowledge. If you would rather I send my
questions, elsewhere, please let me know and I'll be happy to do so.
Thanks again.
George
On 9/24/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 11:27:58AM -0400, George Galt wrote:
> > Can you tell me if the 'hid' component of the kernel is built and
> > loaded as a module rather than as a static "compiled in" module for
> > the kernels from ATRPMs? I'm trying to get the "Elo" touchscreen
> > driver installed and I'm having some difficulty. This one of the
> > possible issues according to Elo.
>
> These parts have been taken over untouched from the Red Hat provided
> kernel rpm, e.g. AFAIK they are static.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
>
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list