[ATrpms-users] FC3 Myth 0.20 Repodata

[Ryan Pisani]

> On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 11:41:17AM -0500, Ryan Pisani wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 07:19:01AM -0500, Ryan Pisani wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 09:06:21PM -0500, Ryan Pisani wrote:
>> >> >> Axel & Crew --
>> >> >> Forgive me if someone has already hit the list up, I've just
>> joined
>> >> this
>> >> >> evening. Anyhow, I've noticed that for some days now the 0.20
>> mythtv
>> >> >> rpms
>> >> >> have been in FC3, FC4, & FC5 repositories (dl.atrpms.net).
>> However,
>> >> it
>> >> >> seems that the repodata is not up to date for the FC3 repository.
>> The
>> >> >> 0.20
>> >> >> rpms are in the stable tree, and I confirmed that by the select
>> few
>> >> >> listed
>> >> >> on the atrpms.net mainpage. However, I'm unable to retrieve them
>> with
>> >> >> either apt or yum clients. Is this intentional, is there some
>> other
>> >> >> issue
>> >> >> I'm not aware of?
>> >> >
>> >> > No, they should be there. What does apt-cache policy mythtv say?
>> After
>> >> > apt-get update, of course?
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> Here you go: Seems to still be picking up 0.19.
>> >
>> > Hm, what does dl.atrpms.net resolve to? There was a switch some weeks
>> > ago, if the name server you use is broken maybe you're still looking
>> > at the old server.
>> >
>> >> [root at frouse2 ~]# apt-get update && apt-cache policy mythtv
>> >> [...]
>> >> Get:6 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable repomd.xml [951B]
>> >
>> >> mythtv:
>> >>   Installed: 0.19-130.fc3.at
>> >>   Candidate: 0.19-130.fc3.at
>> >>   Version Table:
>> >>  *** 0.19-130.fc3.at 0
>> >>         500 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable pkglist
>> >>         500 http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/atrpms/stable/ repomd
>> >>         100 RPM Database
>> >
>> > Also looks like you have double entries.
>> >
>>
>>
>> The dl.atrpms.net that I see is pointing to 130.133.35.11.
>
> That's correct.
>
>> I can navigate the repository via browser and see the 0.20 rpms.
>
> OK.
>
>> But my apt-get doesn't see to pick them up. I looked at
>> primary.xml.gz and it looks like 0.20 isn't there either.
>
> But they are ...
> Hm. The file should start with
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <metadata xmlns="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/common"
> xmlns:rpm="http://linux.duke.edu/metadata/rpm" packages="939">
>
> If not, maybe you are behind a (transparent) caching proxy?
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>


Well. I think your first assumption about dns resolution was correct. I
seem to have multiple returns. I got the .11 address the first time, now I
just did another yum clean, etc, etc and went to get the repo data again.
This time I decided to just rip another nslookup on the dl.atrpms.net. Now
I got the 130.133.35.8 server.  I've queried all 3 in line DNS servers
from my provider and all are replying with .8 now. WTF. But i think this
explains it. I'll work on getting another server to query for lookups.
Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. It must be coincidental
that I managed to get to the repo via http more than once.

Thanks
Ryan