[ATrpms-users] FC6/mplayer/lzo

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:44:48PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> Sorry for asking, Axel
> 
> but why do you need lzo 1.08?

Some projects still need it like transcode. One can patch up transcode
with bits from its development version, but that's possibly an issue
and I don't want to have to deal with it (upstream doesn't).

> I only have lzo 2.02 and I have no dependency problem.
> 
> I only mix ATrpms and Freshrpms.

Perhaps freshrpm has patched up transcode and other apps to use lzo2
instead of lzo1, I can't think of any other way.

But there is no reason to, since lzo1 and lzo2 can coexist if packaged
properly, and I did now so with lzo1. So the issue should have
disappeared now.

> /Paulo Roma.
> 
> On 10/29/06, Mia Via <miavia at myway.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> I'd say downgrade lzo and wait until I get
> >
> >> it to coinstall lzo1 and lzo2.
> >
> >
> >
> >I downgraded lzo to v1 manually but that generated some other error (not
> >sure which by now) and v2 crept back with a later install.  I'll wait.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061030/e9ea75ac/attachment.bin