[ATrpms-users] FC6/mplayer/lzo

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

lzo is from extras.
But if you have everything from freshrpms,
why bother?

I also use mplayerplug-in and transcode from freshrpms
but compile my own mplayer and vlc.

Never had any problem of compatibility with ATrpms, though.

But do not use stuff from FC5, if they are a pre-requisite for other
packages.

/Paulo Roma.

On 10/29/06, Mia Via <miavia at myway.com> wrote:
>
>
> Mplayer doesn't seem to be on the ATRPMS FC6 list. I currently have
> mplayer-1.0-0.33.rc1.fc6 from freshrmps.net, as well as
> mplayerplug-in-3.31-2.fc6 and transcode-1.0.2-11.fc6
>
>
>
> When I yum update with ATRPMS enabled I get the following errors:
>
>
>
> Error: Missing Dependency: mplayer >= 4:0.92 is needed by package
> mplayerplug-in
>
> Error: Missing Dependency: liblzo.so.1 is needed by package transcode
>
>
>
> My lzo is lzo-2.02-2.fc6 and it's from Fedora (not sure if base or
> extras).
>
>
>
> Shall I simply wait for mplayer to show up in the FC6 list, or downgrade
> all those packages that I got from freshrpms to ATRPMS/FC5?
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> No banners. No pop-ups. No kidding.
> Make My Way  your home on the Web - http://www.myway.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061029/53906645/attachment.html