[ATrpms-users] ndiswrapper and kernel modules?
Alex Kruchkoff
A.Kruchkoff at unsw.edu.au
Tue Oct 24 06:06:27 CEST 2006
Dear list users,
below is the list of all kernels and kmdl packages on my box:
alsa-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-1.0.13-55.fc5.at
drbd-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-0.7.20-12.fc5.at
ieee80211-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-1.2.15-14.fc5.at
kernel-module-ATI-fglrx-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-8.29.6-1.fc5
kernel-module-ATI-fglrx-2.6.18-1.2200_2.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-8.29.6-1.fc5
kernel-suspend2-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2
kernel-suspend2-2.6.18-1.2200_2.fc5.cubbi_suspend2
kernel-suspend2-devel-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2
kernel-suspend2-devel-2.6.18-1.2200_2.fc5.cubbi_suspend2
lirc-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-0.8.1-62_cvs20060930.fc5.at
ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-1.16-4.rhfc5.at
shfs-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2187_1.fc5.cubbi_suspend2-0.35-8.fc5.at
Today's anacron job suggested to
...
=== smart reports available updates:
===
Loading cache...
Updating cache... ########################################
[100%]
Computing transaction...
Upgrading packages (8):
DCC-1.3.42-15.fc5.at at x86_64
directfb-0.9.25.1-10.fc5.at at x86_64
imlib2-1.3.0-6.fc5.at at x86_64
libdirect-0.9_25-0.9.25.1-10.fc5.at at x86_64
libfusion-0.9_25-0.9.25.1-10.fc5.at at x86_64
lirc-0.8.1-63_cvs20060930.fc5.at at x86_64
lirc-lib-0.8.1-63_cvs20060930.fc5.at at x86_64
ndiswrapper-1.27-5.fc5.at at x86_64
Installing packages (2):
kernel-xen-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 at x86_64
ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5xen-1.27-5.fc5.at at x86_64
...
Please note that first 7 upgrading packages are not related [I think] to
my question, but may be there hidden dependency..?
My question is: why upgrading ndiswrapper-1.27-5.fc5.at at x86_64
triggers the installation of new kernel
kernel-xen-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5 at x86_64 and kmdl module
ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2200.fc5xen-1.27-5.fc5.at at x86_64 but not
ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2200_2.fc5.cubbi_suspend2 ?
I understand that ndiswrapper-kmdl-2.6.18-1.2200_2.fc5.cubbi_suspend2
may not be available at the time of the anacron job, but why new xen
kernel is suggested for installation?
Is it a packaging error? Or may be I'm missing something?
Many thanks in advance,
Alex
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list