davidmaxwaterman+atrpms-users at fastmail.co.uk
Thu Nov 23 14:53:45 CET 2006
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2006 at 03:10:45PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>> On 11/20/06, Rex Dieter <rdieter at math.unl.edu> wrote:
>>> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
>>>> I guess my friend Richard Stallman would say that I am not being free
>>>> mp3, but ogg does not play in my car. If there is a kaffeine rpm, why
>>>> offer everything it is supposed to do?
>>> Note the missing functionality is mp3 *encoding*. If one simply
>>> installs xine-lib-extras-nonfree, you can decoding for free.
>>> -- rex
>> this was said in my first message. We can also encode using grip, xmcd,
>> mplayer, or whatever. The point is that kaffeine possesses this
>> functionality, so why offer a castrated version? It has a nice interface
>> after all, and it is very simple to encode using kaffeine.
>> I just posted the rpm because I did not find it anywhere. The .src.rpm was
>> downloaded from extras, but the non free part was broken.
>> /Paulo Roma.
> Red Hat is afraid of being sued for freely distributing patented
> software w/o paying royalties to the patent holders, therefore there
> exists a policy that anything hosted on its servers or is directly
> related to the company (e.g. "sponsored by Red Hat") is not allowed to
> carry certain patented parts like mp3, mpeg and so on.
> What I don't understand is why Ubuntu can obviously do that, but
> perhaps that's because Red Hat is in the U.S. and Ubuntu in South
Ubuntu, for all legal purposes, is based out of the Isle of Man, I think
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-users