[ATrpms-users] FC6 kernel update

[Jeff Guerdat]

Axel Thimm wrote:

>> I don't care if I have to wait for the 686 kernel, it's just that I 
>> shouldn't be offered a 585 version.
> 
> Yes, you are right, that shouldn't happen, what did you use?
> yum/apt/smart? I think yum is careful about arch changes.
> 
> The true "buglet" is in the repo, as I updated the repo while the
> kernel packages are being built, e.g. only some were done at the time
> of the update. This sometimes cannot be avoided with the current build
> system as it would require to have another staging area to release
> built packages in groups, e.g. hold back all kernel-suspend2 package
> updates and push them later all together.

Just checked and the 686 versions are now available and yum selected 
these.  It's still not clear to me why a 586 version would have been 
chosen - is that simply because the 686 version wasn't there yet?

Thanks.

-- 
Jeff Guerdat

I have reached an age when, if someone tells me to wear socks,
I don't have to. - Albert Einstein