[ATrpms-users] centos: yum install smart conflict

[Alex Kruchkoff]

Axel Thimm wrote, On 06/11/06 21:27:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:07PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote:
>   
>> Axel Thimm wrote, On 06/11/06 21:07:
>>     
>>> On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:02:17PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>>> I'm getting closer...
>>>>>   
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Indeed:
>>>>
>>>> My /etc/apt/sources.list.d/atrpms.list now is:
>>>>
>>>> repomd http://dl.atrpms.net el$(VERSION)-$(ARCH)/atrpms/stable
>>>> rpm http://dl.atrpms.net el4-i386/atrpms stable
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> Do you really need both?
>>>   
>>>       
>>  From fc5 I remember openoffice was 32 bit only, i downgraded myself 
>> firefox to 32 bits to install flash etc...
>> Plus centos anaconda already installed a lots of 32 bits packages...
>>
>> BTW I already commented out the second line [but I could not complete 
>> packages removal without  this (or may be I'm fooling myself?...) ]
>> Tied and it's the time to go home ;-)
>>     
>
> The i386 packages that a x86_64 system should require are already in
> the x86_64 repo. E.g. no need to enable all i386 packages for
> ATrpms. Or if there really is a need then it's a package specific bug
> you should report :)
>   
will do.
good night: it's late here downunder... :-)