[ATrpms-users] centos: yum install smart conflict

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:17:07PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote, On 06/11/06 21:07:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 09:02:17PM +1100, Alex Kruchkoff wrote:
> >   
> >>> I'm getting closer...
> >>>   
> >>>       
> >> Indeed:
> >>
> >> My /etc/apt/sources.list.d/atrpms.list now is:
> >>
> >> repomd http://dl.atrpms.net el$(VERSION)-$(ARCH)/atrpms/stable
> >> rpm http://dl.atrpms.net el4-i386/atrpms stable
> >>     
> >
> > Do you really need both?
> >   
>  From fc5 I remember openoffice was 32 bit only, i downgraded myself 
> firefox to 32 bits to install flash etc...
> Plus centos anaconda already installed a lots of 32 bits packages...
> 
> BTW I already commented out the second line [but I could not complete 
> packages removal without  this (or may be I'm fooling myself?...) ]
> Tied and it's the time to go home ;-)

The i386 packages that a x86_64 system should require are already in
the x86_64 repo. E.g. no need to enable all i386 packages for
ATrpms. Or if there really is a need then it's a package specific bug
you should report :)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061106/80d4fa82/attachment.bin