[ATrpms-users] ATRPMS Conflicts with Freshrpms

Paulo Cavalcanti promac at gmail.com
Fri Nov 3 18:18:29 CET 2006


No. I am not saying to disable forever.
Only while fixing your dependencies.

I also have both enabled.

But you have to choose which one you are going to satisfy for
those packages. Once you have a consistent system again,
you should have no problem at all, and can reenabled both again.

/Paulo Roma.

On 11/3/06, John Welch <jrw3319 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11/3/06, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > if fact common packages (available in both) are, in general, not
> compatible
> > because they are packaged differently.
> >
> > ffmpeg, transcode, libquicktime, are good examples.
> >
> > Therefore, you have to choose one repo and install all the dependencies,
> > removing the conflicting packages in the process.
> >
> > Whatever is your decision, both repos work very well with mythtv from
> > ATrpms.
> >
> > Freshrpms has also xine and vlc, which are very useful to mythtv,
> because,
> > although I can't live without mplayer, they work better for DVDs and
> > Xinerama.
> >
> > /Paulo Roma.
> >
> Thanks for the response.  I guess I'm a little confused though.  I've
> always had these two repos enabled under FC4 without any issues.  I
> haven't added any packages, at least not intentionally, to cause these
> conflicts.  I know I still have some FC4 packages installed from these
> repos that don't have FC6 versions out yet, but I'm not sure if that
> is the cause of the problem.  If I'm understanding you correctly I
> need to disable one of these repos in order to avoid the conflicts.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061103/e9238b20/attachment.html 


More information about the atrpms-users mailing list