[ATrpms-users] Trouble with several packages. Package does not match checksum.

[Gary McClellan]

I am also seeing this behaviour.

(1/26): mono-data-1.1.13. 100% |=========================| 1.7 MB    00:05
http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-i386/redhat/updates/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno -1] Package does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
http://ayo.freshrpms.net/fedora/linux/5/i386/updates/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404: Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:38:47 GMT
Server: Apache/2.2.2 (Unix)
Content-Length: 341
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Trying other mirror.
http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/5/i386/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Trying other mirror.
http://redhat.download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/5/i386/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Trying other mirror.
http://less.cogeco.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/5/i386/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Trying other mirror.
http://ftp.kddilabs.jp/Linux/packages/fedora/core/updates/5/i386/mono-data-1.1.13.7-1.fc5.1.i386.rpm:
[Errno 9] Requested Range Not Satisfiable
Trying other mirror.


On 5/11/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:06:33PM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> > For Fedora, the following packages seem to be having problems.  Notice
> > that there are 3 different versions of FC involved.
> >
> > ghostscript-8.15.2-1.1.i386.rpm
> > kdebase-3.5.2-0.3.fc5.i386.rpm
> > dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC5.i386.rpm
> > dhcdbd-1.14-1.FC4.x86_64.rpm
> > xterm-212-1.FC4.x86_64.rpm
> > xterm-212-1.FC4.i386.rpm
> > bind-9.3.2-20.FC5.i386.rpm
> > anacron-2.3-38.FC5.i386.rpm
> > bind-utils-9.3.2-20.FC5.i386.rpm
> > nfs-utils-1.0.8.rc2-5.FC5.i386.rpm
> > bind-libs-9.3.2-20.FC5.i386.rpm
> > system-config-printer-0.6.151.4-1.i386.rpm
> > xterm-212-1.FC5.i386.rpm
> > kernel-smp-devel-2.6.16-1.2107_FC5.i686.rpm
>
> On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:18:51PM -0500, hondaman wrote:
> > I reported about a week ago an entire list of broken packages.
> > ghostscript is broken still, that much is for sure.  I havent verified
> > the other packages.  When will the broken packages be fixed?
>
> They are probably not broken, since you're the only one seeing
> this. Maybe you're behind a caching proxy? Or using
> download.fedora.redhat.com? In any case the verbatim error output
> would be better.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users
>
>
>


-- 
Gary McClellan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060511/c37b9260/attachment.html